❄ Air Conditioner Sizing

AC Sizing Calculator

Size a central air conditioner from your home's cooling load. Applies standard equipment sizing rules (95-115%), converts to standard tonnage sizes, compares SEER2 efficiency levels, and estimates annual electricity costs.

Unit System:
BTU/hr
Calculate cooling load →
°F·days
Lookup CDD →
°F
$/kWh
Calculate SHR →
❄ AC Sizing Results

Standard Tonnage Options

SEER2 Efficiency Comparison

SEER2Annual kWhAnnual Costvs 13.4 SEER2
Export:

How to size a central air conditioner correctly

The most common AC sizing mistake in Canada is oversizing. A contractor installs a 3-ton unit in a house that needs 2 tons because "bigger is better" or to avoid a callback. The result: the AC cools the air so fast it shuts off before removing enough moisture. The house hits temperature setpoint but stays at 65% RH instead of 50%. Occupants feel uncomfortable, fiddle with the thermostat, and call back anyway.

The 95-115% sizing rule

Standard equipment sizing practice limits AC selection to 95-115% of the calculated cooling load at design conditions. Below 95%, the system struggles on the hottest days. Above 115%, you get short-cycling and humidity problems. This calculator flags both conditions. The cooling load calculator gives you the accurate load to feed in here.

SEER2 vs. SEER: what changed

SEER2 replaced SEER in 2023. The test procedure uses a higher external static pressure (0.5 in. w.g. vs. 0.1 in. w.g.) that better reflects real-world duct systems. A 16 SEER unit is roughly equivalent to 15.2 SEER2. Canada's minimum is 13.4 SEER2. Energy Star Canada requires 15.2 SEER2. For a Canadian home running AC 500-800 hours per year, stepping from 13.4 to 18 SEER2 typically saves $80-150/year.

Don't forget latent capacity

If your space SHR is below 0.70, standard AC equipment may not remove enough moisture even when correctly sized by BTU/hr. Check the SHR calculator to confirm equipment SHR matches your space SHR.

Frequently Asked Questions

You can't size an AC from square footage alone. A 2,000 ft² home in Vancouver with modern insulation might need 1.5 tons. The same house in Windsor, Ontario with large west-facing windows could need 3 tons. Climate, insulation, window area, orientation, internal gains, and ceiling height all matter. Use the cooling load calculator to get the real number. Contractors who size by square footage are guessing.

At a 24,000 BTU/hr (2-ton) load in Toronto (600 CDD), 16 SEER2 uses about 880 kWh/year vs. 1,060 kWh/year at 13.4 SEER2 — a saving of about 180 kWh or roughly $23/year at $0.13/kWh. That's modest. The payback on a $400 premium for the higher efficiency unit is 17 years — not compelling. The real reason to go higher efficiency is dehumidification: higher SEER2 units often run longer at lower capacity, removing more moisture. In a humid climate like southern Ontario, that's worth more than the electricity savings.

For most Canadian homes, yes. A two-stage or variable-speed system runs at lower capacity most of the time, which means longer run times, better dehumidification, quieter operation, and more even temperatures. The premium is $500-1,200 over single-stage. In humid climates like southern Ontario, the dehumidification improvement alone justifies the cost. In drier climates like Calgary, the benefit is primarily comfort and noise reduction.